Coptic Forums

The official forums of the Coptic Media Network, focusing on Coptic hymns, Orthodoxy, spirituality, friendship, and member experiences.

PRENUP Agreement . and Why get married ?

Post new topic This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.

1, 2  Next

tonyhabibi

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Mar 09, 2007 - 06:43 PM

Is the coptic church against Prenup agreements ( u know the whole money thing ) ?

I think pre nups are good . And i know the most difficult part of the whole thing would be asking your lover to agree to a preNUP . .... but i Think in the end , only the poor person will be dissapointed they didnt do a prenup , which in the end , shows they are a 2 faced money / blood sucking person . Sinner !

I am for the pre nup ... but i admit it is rather hard to bring up the topic to your spouse .


------

is the notion for marriage only to satisfy a sacrament ?

second .... Why should people get married ? Does it change anything or increase the love people have in the relationship ?

when u are long time boyfriend and girlfriends with someone ... im sure your very much in love with someone just as u would be when ur married ... so why do u get married ? .... is it only cuz of legal matters ?

i see no need for marriage , perhaps if u want kids .... maybe it will just make things a whole lot easier with the goverment .... but if u are not planning on having kids ... i dont see a reason to get married , if u can be happy while just having your girlfriend who u are faithful too , then i see no reason for a marriage .

will it make u happier ? .... Whats the point ?


_________________
( insert Cool Signature here , think original )

View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

catcouta

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Mar 10, 2007 - 03:54 AM

Tony are you really saying this? or (hopefully) is it another of your "jokes"?

View user's profile Send private message

Noosa_1978

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Mar 10, 2007 - 11:33 PM

Well I feel and srtongly believe that marriage is permanent and should be taken seriously. I know that in the USA, the divorce rate is very high because people tend to neglect their marriages. However, if one works on their marriage and keeps it together, they do not have to be a statistic. People who actually wait to marry end up staying married because, the old a person gets, the more mature and responsible they are. But if one feel that they are going to fail at marriage, don't get married at all. Younger people need to take the time to get to know themselves better. Marriage is actually for people that are matured and ready to deal with the respondsiblity of it. It is not fun and games anymore. However, if a spouse passes away. For example, the husband dies. He should make out a will and have a plan. Discuss this plan with his wife. This way he can make sure his wife and kids are taken care of and provided for, in case he dies.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address

joey.y

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Mar 11, 2007 - 01:12 AM

Dear Tony,

I have an answer for the second part of your question "why get married?"

People get married not because of the government or the fact that it is a church Sacrament. More importantly it is because it is a Divine Commandment
"Then God blessed them, and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply.(Gn 1:28).

We do not take this verse alone and apply it to everyone. God has given others different gifts and callings in life "others have renounced marriage because of the kingdom of heaven" (Mt.19:12) (i.e. Monasticism). This in itself is another issue, but is important so that I am not misunderstood.

In the context of marriage, it is very easy for two individuals to say that they love each other and not be married. The difference between this case and that of a married couple is that the married couple is united in Christ.

"Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and they shall become one flesh"(Gn.2:24).These two individuals are united in Christ through the mystery of the Holy Spirit in the Sacrament.

I hope my two penny's worth were of some benifit.

Please pray for me,
Joey

View user's profile Send private message

karas7

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Mar 11, 2007 - 08:37 AM

i am ok with prenups in todays society but come on why should we get married....the need to get married what is marriage about well mate i think its time for u to have a sitting with ur foc....thats all i got to say about that!

View user's profile Send private message

tonyhabibi

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Mar 11, 2007 - 09:57 AM

hmmm , it is of my opinion , that if a person gets married with a prenup ... then he is going against the essence of marriage , which is trust , and unity with one another ..... a prenup goes against marriage , however , if im filthy rich , and i marry a woman , who is very poor , and we get a divorce ..... in US court , she will probably get more then half .... now , if i make 20 million dollars a year , and she takes half of that , .... its not a big deal , im not starving ...
but if i make 20,000 a year , ... and she takes half ..... i might have to kill her . - chris rock .

prenups are good in the american society and way of living .
but useless in coptic orthodox , cuz once ur married ... its forever .... ( unless there is adultery ) .


anyways ,

no , i was semi joking about the marriage part in my initial post , i know the good things of getting married and the religious support for it .

anyways , is it then only for religious reasons / legal reasons on why people get married ? or can a couple be that much more in love if they announce their unity offically ? .....

whats the point ? is there a point ? hehe . i love rambling .


_________________
( insert Cool Signature here , think original )

View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

TheLivingWater

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Mar 13, 2007 - 03:58 AM

Traditionally, a man and a woman only move in under the same roof after marraige. This still stands true for Egyptian marraiges/relationships. Assuming that you're planning on following tradition, then if you were to live with the woman you loved, you would have to marry her first. For those who won't end up following tradition, then there is still a difference between living together unmarried and living together married. Having an intimate relationship with someone out of marriage is forbidden in the Bible, so if you're planning on starting a family, then getting married is essential. Besides, Coptic marriages are permanent except in extreme cases. If you only live with someone without marrying them, then both parties can leave at any time. How would you deal with separating joint accounts? Who would get the house? Who would get the furniture? Besides, marriage is the ultimate relevation of love. Marriage distinguishes the person whom you wish to marry from any other previous relationships. Marriage says that this person is the only person you want to spend the rest of your life with, and that you're not afraid of being committed to this person, and that you'll always be there for them. Unlike just plainly living with each other, a married couple agrees to be there for each other in good times and in bad, in sickness and in health. When you're bound by this sort of promise which is consecrated in the church, a couple has much more of a likelihood of staying with each other than just moving in with each other. Marriage means that you will never be with another woman in your life. Living together just means that you really like the person and want to get to know them more intimately (and goes against tradition). You're not bound by anything when you just live with a person, and at if both parties know that at any time one can just get up and walk away, then it is almost inevitable that one party will. It's not much of a commitment and doesn't say much about how far you are willing to go to show that one person in the world how much you love them. And having the choice to walk out on your mind, you'll become much weaker in will. If you know that you can get a college degree in 4 years from one college, but another college has offered to give you a degree in 2 years, with the same amount of time put in and the same amount of knowledge taken out, then it's much easier for a person to just take the easy way out. If you know that you can get up and walk away from a relationship without being held religiously or financially responsible, it's more likely that that's exactly what you'll do. But if you're bound by marriage, then a big argument will be dealt with responsibly.


_________________
"He who is full loathes honey, but to the hungry even what is bitter tastes sweet." Proverbs 27:7

View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

Mathitis

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Mar 14, 2007 - 02:48 AM

Applaud my humility(Cool), but can somebody explain to me what a "prenup" is?


_________________
For by your words you shall be justified, and by your words you shall be condemned. - Matthew 12:37

Image
+ To Protect and Preserve +
HCOC: Sing it! Live it! Love it!

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

AMoussa01

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Mar 14, 2007 - 03:13 AM

prenup or prenuptial agreement is a contract entered into by two people prior to marriage. There are two types of prenuptial agreements: marriage contract for people who are married or about to be married, and cohabitation agreement for unmarried couples. Basically it is a partial solution to obviating some of the risks of marital property disputes in times of divorce.

pray for me
Tony

View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

Mathitis

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Mar 15, 2007 - 07:06 PM

From AMoussa01:prenup or prenuptial agreement is a contract entered into by two people prior to marriage. There are two types of prenuptial agreements: marriage contract for people who are married or about to be married, and cohabitation agreement for unmarried couples. Basically it is a partial solution to obviating some of the risks of marital property disputes in times of divorce.

pray for me
Tony


Ah. Thanks Tony. I find it ridiculous.


_________________
For by your words you shall be justified, and by your words you shall be condemned. - Matthew 12:37

Image
+ To Protect and Preserve +
HCOC: Sing it! Live it! Love it!

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

TheLivingWater

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Mar 16, 2007 - 08:20 AM

From Mathitis:

Ah. Thanks Tony. I find it ridiculous.


I agree with you, Mathitis. It's pretty ridiculous.


_________________
"He who is full loathes honey, but to the hungry even what is bitter tastes sweet." Proverbs 27:7

View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

petergergis

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Mar 16, 2007 - 08:14 PM

Marriage is a sacrament. The Church's 7 sacraments are also called the 7 pillars of the Church or the 7 pillars of wisdom. To discount the value of any of the sacraments is simply a mindset which is not in the faith. The sacrament of marriage was institude by God, blessed by the Holy Spirit, and even re-affirmed by Jesus Christ (at the wedding of Cana).

When God made man, He said, " I shall make the man a companion" then it says in the book of Genesis "..And He made them Male and Female that they may abide.". The notion of "girlfriend and boyfriend" is actually something new from 20th and 21st centuries. Tony, you wrote something like, "why is it important to be married if a guy and a girl have been dating for a while and they truly love each other."

Marriage is a union. Through the sacrament, the man and the woman become as 1 in the sight of God. As such, love is not the only part of the equation in a relationship. Also, under the authority of God a man and woman should be married in order to "live together". Christ said, "If any man so much as looks at a woman in lust, he has committed adultery."! So, if only by looking, we can commit adultery, then what time of "moseeba" would a boyfriend/girlfriend couple be in?

The sacrament of marriage is very important, and for the above reasons, just being "together" and being "in love" doesn't mean its ok to live together and act as though you were married.

Next is the pre-nup. Divorses were first allowed by Moses when the Israelites were in one of their "evil periods". He allowed the man to present to his wife, a certificate of divorse.This was not according to the will of God, and when the Jews asked Christ about this He said, " because of the wickedness of your hearts Moses allowed a man to present his wife a certificate of divorse. But I tell you that any man who divorses his wife and marries another has committed adultery, and any woman who has divorced her husband and married another has committed adultery.". So, Christ himself said that divorse was not an option. However the church does grant annulments of the marriage under strict circumstances, so that the people of the church don't live in sin.

Divorse should never be an option. Two people who get married, are in it for life, Marriage isn't something that is easy and it for sure will require effort. This leads to the Pre-Nup part.

Pre-nups are basically like saying: We're getting married, and becoming 1 in the eyes of God (if you're marrying in a sacramental church) but, i don't want to share. I don't want you to really be part of me. just be part of some of me, but not all of me. Pre-nups guard against marriages that are based on publicity, wealth, or lust..not love. I do believe that they are wrong.

If two people are getting married for the right reasons, they shouldn't have to worry about who gets what in the event of a divorse, because they won't get a divorse- they work out their problems, instead of running from them.

I hope this wasn't too much, and that it helped. God bless you all. Please remember me in your prayers.

View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger

TheLivingWater

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Mar 17, 2007 - 08:37 AM

I agree with what you've said petergergis, but I'd like to add that a divorce is permitted in the church in the case of adultery, of course adultery is prohibited, but in the case that it occurs, a divorce is permitted.


_________________
"He who is full loathes honey, but to the hungry even what is bitter tastes sweet." Proverbs 27:7

View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

Noosa_1978

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Mar 19, 2007 - 06:32 PM

If someone does not want to marry, they should not have to. More and more people today are actually waitting to marry. Marriage is something one should do but only when they are ready and meet the right person to marry. The person that they know that they are going to want to spend the rest of their live with. Because once two people get married, there is no turning back.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address

irishpilgrim

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Sep 14, 2010 - 01:40 AM

tonyhabibi,

I hope you won’t be offended by this tardy attempt to join this important discussion. I have not been able to review this site for several months, so I am attempting to catch-up.

Pre-nuptual contracts are NOT ridiculous. They are the only means by which the husband, his children and the estate that he has worked for to provide for his family can be protected from a disloyal, dishonest, greedy, marriage vow breaking, typical Coptic feminist wife and her greedier lying divorce lawyer. The contract’s terms have nothing to do with loyalty, trust, love, happiness, companionship, or any other issue of the Coptic Marriage Liturgy, unless one of the parties (always the feminist wife in my experience over 14 years in the Coptic Church) decides that she no longer will live under their marriage vows. Very sadly, neither Pope Shenouda nor any bishop, priest, servant, nor mercenary official Coptic marriage counsellor will firmly, officially, publically state and preach any opposition to this feminist mocking of God’s gender and marriage commandments and the clear terms of the Sacramental Coptic Marriage Liturgy. Life within their marriage vows is of no concern to the marriage contract. It can be locked in the safety deposit box before the marriage and hopefully never be disturbed during the life of husband and wife. When one spouse dies, so does the Pre-Nup contract. Unless the feminist wife is planning to, or wants to preserve the right to, profit from breaking the marriage vows, there is no reasonable basis for refusing to negotiate and sign it.

Tony, you have honestly, maybe innocently, asked the most incisive pre-marital questions for teen and young adult Coptic men. Perhaps you have experienced the misery of young Coptic husbands and their children suffering with a disloyal, disobedient nagging/divorcing Coptic feminist wife. This is faith threatening misery of the highest order. Not only for the remaining life of the mature, faith formed father, but especially for the demonically traumatized development and remaining atrophied spiritual and social life of his pitiable children.

In the apostate feminist/atheistic, psycho-sociologic worshipping/ divorce nurturing milieu of the current (and seemingly future) Coptic Church, no Coptic man who intends to have children and to pursue any phase of the American dream for the benefit of his family and children should marry any Coptic woman, or woman from any other culture, who has been exposed to any degree of feminism, without the protection of an unbreakable pre-marital contract, that has been prepared and executed by a well known specially skilled and certified attorney, to protect his child custody and financial interests. I haven’t checked recently, but there should be many books available that describe the details that are required in a “water tight” premarital contract. Read the books for background, but only depend on a well known specialist attorney to draft and execute the documents. Don’t choose the attorney because he speaks Arabic. Get the most advanced terms because lawyers become wealthy by innovating new ways to break marriage contracts. The deception of security by marrying an educated woman from Egypt is not wise. Apparently the previous generation of educated Coptic feminists have infested all of the urban Coptic churches, the male and female monastaries (all of our current educated feminist/pseudoscience Coptic bishops were [mis]formed in Egyptian male monasteries. This could be an expected sign that the rampant demonic immorality in U.S. EO monasteries has also immigrated to these Egyptian monasteries. It would be ecumenical unity for these demons to migrate from the earlier, post feminism, Catholic seminaries which accomplished their international pediphile/ homosexual cardinals, bishops, priests and servants scandals.), the Egyptian schools and universities, and the general Egyptian (urban and rural) educated Coptic culture. It hasn’t taken long for the intense demonic feminism in some U.S. Coptic parishes to convert some minimally educated rural Egyptian Coptic women to become marriage/husband hating feminists. To an illiterate outsider, like me, it appears that demonic Egyptian feminism is largely a Coptic exclusive. Occassionaly I read or hear interviews or commentaries by Muslim (by birth or converted) women. They have always admiringly defended all of their traditional patriarchal Muslim beliefs and customs. I have never read nor heard any similar defense of traditional Orthodox Christian biblical patriarchal beliefs and customs by any Coptic patriarch, bishop, priest, male or female servant of the Coptic Church. Coptic men who have been divorced by Coptic feminists, intensely study and discuss these bible verses, among themselves, in detail. Their (demonic?) Coptic bishops, priests and mercenary Coptic psycho/sociologist counsellors refuse to discuss or consider God’s patriarchal maxims concerning marriage and family life with these emasculated fathers. The specific terms of the Sacramental Coptic Marriage Liturgy have not provided any protection for the husband, who has been divorced by his Coptic feminist wife, in any case that I am aware of. I don’t know of any Coptic husband caused divorce (such as Pope Shenouda and all Coptic clergy hypothesize), but I can imagine that the same hypocrites would stand on the Coptic Marriage Liturgy to defend their divorced, pitiable rejected sisters.

The first caution is to be extremely observant of every female associates’ feminist interests and tendencies. Their feminist curiosities and interests are supported by your bishop, priests, church servants, church and school classmates, teachers and workmates. I presume that you seek to obey and worship in the way that God has instructed us. God made women to be a helper for man that was similar to him. Gen. 2:18-23. After woman obstinately disobeyed God’s order, God clearly ordered that she was to be ruled by man. Gen. 3:16b. All forms and degrees of feminism defy and/or promote defiance of this and other of God’s patriarchal orders and laws. God’s biblical principles and your cautions and concerns will probably be ridiculed, or just ignored. A feminist is a person who is demonically addicted to, or experimenting with any degree of feminism. Unless you are clearly detached and professionally experienced, avoid her and her close friends like you would avoid a drug junky and his gang members. Don’t be deceived that you can convert or save her from this addiction to feminism. It is not worth the risk of your future family, innocent children and livelihood. Concentrate on techniques for identifying feminists. If they are on the prowl for a sucker husband, they will act very submissive and compliant. A technique that has worked for me is to criticize another “woman car driver.” Feminists have immediately angered and defended the unknown other woman, or generally criticized men drivers. Watch carefully, this is a crucial life and family saving matter. You are communicating with powerful demons. I have never won an argument with demonic thoughts. Don’t be seduced to try these arguments. Flee away.

Except for a rare patriarchal protestant bible believer, or website, or a faithful divorced Coptic husband, you will have difficulty growing in an understanding of God’s patriarchal biblical gender and family codes. Like you, your contemporaries are reluctant to discuss this crucial faith issue which has been uncompromisingly tabooed, without explanation, by the highest officials of the Coptic Church. The major Orthodox Fathers, especially St. John Chrysostom, are thoroughly patriarchal in all of their bible commentaries. You can read (with some difficulty) most of their commentaries on the patriarchal gender and family verses and codes at, for instance <http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf113.iii.iv.xxi.html>, which discusses St. Paul’s letter to the Ephesians, 5:22, et seq. Read through all of the gender and family related verses and their commentaries. St. Augustine’s bible commentaries are also patriarchal, but are erratic and require caution, they may sometimes provide a wider (not deeper) insight.

To the contrary, I think that God approves of our righteousness intended desires and actions to provide spiritual and material stability and security for our family and community. In my pre-modern Catholic Church days we learned that frugality is a virtue that can help provide sustenance and comfort to more members of our family, community and neighbors. In light of these present realities I would be grateful and relieved by a marriage prospect who refused to accept my pre-nuptual contract - which should also provide terms that relieve her holy intentioned anxieties - and accept that God does not desire that we entrap ourselves in sacramental union with any potential rebellious, God hating, man hating feminist. The evil intended institutions of our money centric capitalistic/ legalistic nation, state, county and local governments and businesses, in support of a rebellious feminist wife can also be a real threat to our families’ well being that we should learn to strongly protect. Divorce is a huge international industry. It employs millions of highly paid lawyers, psychologists, psychiatrists, physicians, investigators, accountants, police, security firms, etc.; and ruins untold billions of dollars worth of family businesses. It wants your family’s contribution.

It is the pathetic state of our culture and churches that you are required to ponder alternatives to marriage for a secure God designed, lifelong patriarchal companionship. After having too intimately experienced the insanity and moral impoverishment of the demonic U.S. boyfriend/girlfrend, dating, necking, dancing, drinking, partying, petting, toking, hooking up, shacking, partnering, etc. abomination (all huge money making sins), wherein everyone becomes used merchandise to some, usually unknown, degree; it was a bright new world to me to learn the Satan hated Coptic custom of separation until blessed commitment/ marriage. This is the most perfect custom for maturation/ preparation for marriage that I can imagine. The self and others compromising/ destroying U.S. sex games are avoided consensually by the community, which relieves some of the individual burden and discipline. This is an invaluable custom which conflicts with your search for an alternative to marriage. Any alternative makes both you and your partner make yourselves into self-made disgusting, used, discarded inhuman trash and refuse.

I think it would be very ackward and uncomfortable to try to live and worship in any Coptic community with an unmarried female partner. For good reason you would not be welcomed nor be able to receive the sacraments. You would be a scandal and bad example to the rest of the community. You would be in constant discomfort of sin and this would increasingly compromise your general spiritual, emotional, and even physical strength. Your partner would experience similar stresses and the likelihood of “divorce” would probably be higher than if married. This does not alleviate the legal joint property issue of marriage. Over the years, if it lasts any time, you would accumulate his, hers and ours property, which if of any value, would lead to conflict upon separation. Living with male room mates seems a better alternative. Over time, this can also be uncomfortable.

The best option seems to be to wait until God finds you a nonfeminist patriarchal woman (they are very rare) who will welcome the mutual benefits of an adequate pre-nuptual contract. The Holy Bible is full of God’s condemnations/warnings of the pains caused by feminist-like women. Study pre-nuptual contract terms together so you can help others with the same U.S. cultural challenges.

Please also remember that, in a time of apparent difficulty, St. Paul responded to a letter from the Corinthians by stating that it was then better not to marry if you were able to exercise self-control. See, 1 Cor. 7:1-40.You should then check to see how St. Chrysostom thought about these thoughts of St. Paul.

Yes, God made woman to make man happy in the patriarchal way that God designed, created and ordered. Demonic, atheistic feminism defies God’s and man’s patriarchal orders and makes everyone, especially their own children, miserable.


_________________
+Our Father, blessed are your Ways and Statutes. Those who love You know and obey them. Deliver Your orthodox families, children and people from the error, misery and confusion caused by unaware, disinterested, proud, fearful, rebellious or innovative patriarchs, bishops, priests, false teachers, influences and spirits who seek to ignore, change, compromise, and destroy the Holy patriarchal gender and family orders and laws that You have established for Your Orthodox Christian Churches and people from the beginning and forever and ever. For their salvation, admonish them with the wisdom, understanding and knowledge of Malachi 2:1-9, 13-17.+

View user's profile Send private message

Ranya+++

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Sep 14, 2010 - 06:37 AM

Dear Irishpilgrim:

I want to first off apologize for your negative experiences. May God grant you comfort and peace.

Please forgive me, as I may have skimmed through parts of your post (it was quite long).

I would have to disagree with you on prenuptial agreements. I don’t believe in those agreements, and I don’t know too much about them either. Marriage is a lifelong commitment. It is also a HUGE responsibility.

Unfortunately, you are right. Current statistics point to high divorce rates among couples both inside and outside the Church.

A Catholic priest once mentioned that the devil chooses to “divide and conquer” like a general in the military. The family is being under attack by the devil because once the family breaks down, society as a whole starts to break down.

I strongly believe in the marriage God intended us to have. I believe that men and women are very different; however, our souls are of the same nature. I think St. John Chrysostom mentioned that in one of his homilies or writings.

Sometimes I think St. John Chrysostom was a romantic because he writes so beautifully about marriage. He gives one a deeper understanding of marriage and how our Lord intended it to be.

Since I’m still reading “On Living Simply,” which is a compilation of St. John Chrysostom’s homilies, I’ll provide you with a nice quote.


When we speak of the wife obeying the husband, we normally think of obedience in military or political terms: the husband giving orders, and the wife obeying them. But while this type of obedience may be appropriate in the army, it is ridiculous in the intimate relationship of marriage. The obedient wife does not wait for orders. Rather, she tries to discern her husband’s needs and feelings, and responds in love. When she sees her husband is weary, she encourages him to rest; when she sees him agitated, she soothes him; when he is ill, she nurses and comforts him; when he is happy and elated, she shares his joy. Yet such obedience should not be confined to the wife; the husband should be obedient in the same way. When she is weary, he should relieve her of her work; when she is sad, he should cherish her, holding her gently in his arms; when she is filled with good cheer, he should also share her good cheer. Thus a good marriage is not a matter of one partner obeying the other, but of both partners obeying each other.

On Living Simply, The Golden Voice of John
Chrysostom
Complied by Robert Van de Weyer
P.72

St. John Chrysostom mentioned in one of his homilies that when a couple becomes united in One flesh, it is no longer the husband owning certain items or claiming that money belongs to him. There is no, “this is mine or this is hers in marriage.” In marriage, it belongs to the One flesh the married couple now makes up.

The fact is each one of us needs to really take responsibility for our decisions. Marriage is a decision. We choose to love someone based on our decisions. It is not based on a feeling or feelings because those can change from day to day.

Some of our clergy try to provide guidance in making the right decision. We can make the right or wrong decisions in marriage, but ultimately, the choice is ours. Hopefully, people will be able to discern God’s will with the proper guidance.

Once again, I am sorry for your negative experiences. May you find peace in our Lord. My apologies if I drifted off topic.


Take care and God Bless,
+ + +

View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

mgeorge

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Sep 15, 2010 - 03:08 PM

Dear Tony,
I did not read all of the posts; I skimmed through the long ones. My apologies to all those who wrote long posts and forgive me if I repeat any of your opinions.

Pre-nub is a very personal thing, and as far as I know it was a social tradition practiced in Upper Egypt. The Coptic Church synod, as far as I know again, replaced this habit and with the "engagement ceremony". And again I can be wrong. However I don't know much about the pre-nub issue and it is not the reason why I am posting. I would like to give my view about marriage.

Marriage is not about just being a "Sacrament"; it is a sacrament because of much more. In the Coptic Rite for Marriage there are only two readings; the Pauline Epistle, and the Gospel. The Pauline Epistle is from Ephesians 5 (please read it before you continue), and it is a type of the Church and Christ. Now you are going to say "oh it is only a metaphor", but the word type means more than a symbol; it means an unfading reality hidden in an act. When the apostle mentions that "wives should submit to their husbands" it does not mean oppression. The Church is never oppressed by Christ, but in fact Christ himself gave her the authority to act on his behalf on earth ("What you bind on earth is bound in heaven"). Therefore submission is like when the hand submits to brain signals. It is not oppression; it is harmony. Also, when it says "Husbands love your wives as Christ also loved the church and gave himself for her" (rewording) it really means you are the Christ of this relationship, you are responsible for your wife's well being, spiritual growth, you sanctify your family, you are the one who puts his life on the line for the family regarding any matter. (Spiritually, mentally, socially, economically, etc.)

"Well", someone may say, "all this can be done by simply living together." You may be absolutely right, except that there is a greater issue here. You cannot be Christ and she the church except in a unity in God, with God. You can do all things that Christ did and does, but you cannot be Christ without God. We could never be a church, if it wasn't for God (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit), and so is the wife. That unity with God comes as being individually part of God's Church, and as a couple act and live within the context of God's Church.

Therefore Marriage is a binding agreement of Love. It comes with a price, just like being part of the household of God comes with a price, but the divine love is what binds us as one in essence yet two in persons.

I hope this shows the real side of what marriage really means. And again, I can be completely wrong (although I don't think so).

Having re-read this again, my words are so inadequate as much as confusing. I apologies because I cannot explain it further.

Pray for me.


_________________
Pray for me,
<b>Moheb</b>

<i>"Till we all come in the <u>unity of the faith</u>, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, <b>unto a perfect man</b>, unto the measure of the stature of <u>the fulness of Christ</u>" (Ephesians 4:13)</i> <b>AMEN.</b>

"εγω ειμι η αναστασις και η ζωη" - <b>ιησου χριστου</b>

View user's profile Send private message

irishpilgrim

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Sep 17, 2010 - 06:03 AM

Ranya+++,

Thank you for your compassionate thoughts. I am at peace with the personal affects of my divorce. I thank God for the experiences. Although I lost my home, business and financial estate because of the divorce, I have since received adequate sustenance and great spiritual blessings and redirection from the experience. As in all divorces, my eight children were the main losers. They lost emotional strength and confidence, peace and security, a comfortable unified family, their faith, respect for their parents, and the comfort and assistance they could have received from my business and estate. They are angry and alienated from their relatives and each other, for life. My experiences have given me knowledge and skills that have enabled me to help other fathers deal more effectively with the resulting shock, disappointment and disruption when their rebellious feminist wives have destroyed their marriage and caused a divorce. I haven’t found any way to replace what their pitiable children have lost for life and for ever and ever.

Rampant destruction of marriages by angry, vicious rebellious feminist wives is a new phenomenon which, since about 1970, has grown to destroy nearly one-half of Catholic and Protestant marriages. These divorces are increasingly encouraged and supported by Coptic feminists, and are not adequately opposed by any U.S. Coptic bishops and priests. Ineffective mercenary Coptic “marriage” (divorce) counsellors are having a resulting business boom. Notice how they have swarmed, in a feeding frenzy, around our feminist bishops and large parishes with feminist, psycho/sociological priests and priests’ wives. Feminism promises to overcome women’s God created nature and assigned role and obtain their equality, and even superiority to the God created nature and role of men. This is their new feminist Freudian re-creation. Without patriarchal spiritual opposition, there is no reasonable obstacle to the Coptic divorce rate eventually matching the overall U.S., Catholic and Protestant divorce rate of 50% of marriages.

If we had no demonic, deceptive, selfish, ambitious, disobedient, betraying Coptic feminist wives, there could be some reasonable expectation of the idyllic, secure, righteous marriages that you describe, that the patriarchal churches had in the past, and that both you and I would prefer. As you note, this is certainly not the case, and Satan is fomenting an epidemic of mothers’ emotional slaughter of many generations of their own defenseless Coptic children (in their own doomed shortsighted, temporary feminist power grab). Our Pope and bishops now worship a demonic “new” pseudo-science that they have chosen to experiment with on our wives and children to replace their faith in the patriarchal gender and family laws that were given to us by our patriarchal God in the beginning. Like all of our laws, our divorce laws are designed by demonically brilliant divorce lawyers to serve their own greedy financial purposes. A feminist wife/mother betrayed family and its assets and savings is nothing but raw meat to be voraciously torn apart and devoured by this insatiable industry. A few dirty scraps, if any remain, may be thrown to the pathetic disobedient betrayer Coptic feminist wife. A skillfully prepared anticipatory pre-nuptual marriage contract (that hopefully will never even be thought of during the marriage) is the only reasonably effective, nonviolent civil weapon for the Coptic husband’s defense in this demonic arena. Don’t expect any support from your Pope, bishop, or priest. They have misinformed your parish members that all divorces are caused by husbands, so your so called, “friends from church” will not support you, but may also betray you.

I also double check every possible question during my many years of effort to study the patriarchal paradigm of every facet of our Holy Orthodox Tradition and of God’s Holy Bible against every available English translation of the relevant writings and commentaries of St, John Chrysostom and some other Orthodox Fathers. I do not have confidence in Catholic translations and paraphrases because they seldom stray from their polemical agenda and are often very cunning theological con artists and wordsmiths. The disappointment that I’ve noticed in the last 10-15 years is that Eastern Orthodox (EO) feminist theo/thealogians have created many fraudulent modern translations and paraphrases of St. Chrysostom’s works. If you have carefully read and studied the older translations, you can notice the varying degrees of feminization/ neutralization in the more recent feminism influenced fraudulent translations; and especially in the protestant-like polemically selected isolated paraphrases. I have this suspicion about the excerpt and its context that you quoted. I was disappointed that the reference to St. Chrysostom’s source text was not provided, so that I could check out my suspicion. I agree with the general spirit of the excerpt, but only if it is placed in an overarching patriarchal context, which the Holy Bible and St.Chrysostom always do.

I would have to examine the source and context of your statement that men’s and women’s souls are of the same nature. There are many Bible and Fathers’ verses that seem to contradict/nuance this conclusion. Satan and his demons understand this. Satan chose the woman to deceive and lead mankind into disobedience and death. St. Chrysostom noted this and commented that the wife must always submit to and obey her husband because “the woman led first and lost all.” St. Paul referred to this same principle. 1Tim. 2:11-14; 1Cor. 11:7-10. Similar demonic feminist disobedience leads to the lifelong sufferings and spiritual deaths of increasing numbers of Coptic families.

I see that it is a potential problem when many young Copts seem to marry seeming cross country or international strangers from strange families in the context of an arbitrary abandonment of the traditional, biblical patriarchal model of gender and family relationships. Please don’t misunderstand me, the U.S. dating, necking, petting, shacking routine is worse than marrying an unused stranger in many ways. In these cases, of marrying a semi-stranger, I believe that a pre-nuptual marriage contract is especially important to protect against family fatal feminist surprises. Instead of the patriarchal gender and family model, of which everyone in the “Christian” world had the same understanding, for centuries, now everybody is “playing” a different game, no one knows the rules, there are no rules, everyone has his/her own secret/conditional rules. This problem is largely magnified when our heirarchy have imposed an already failed, insane, anti-biblical, demonic, “modern” rebellious feminism encouraging, secretive, amorphous psycho/ sociological experimental “mulligan stew “ courting and marriage relationship “model” on our Coptic marriage age youth. The atheistic U.S. culture and education industry also universally impose their similar anti-patriarchal feminist agenda on everyone.

I think you are blaming the innocent victim husband and children when you take the free choice/personal responsibility cop out. The husband and wife stand before the altar, their priest, families and their community. The wife vows lifelong patriarchal obedience under all circumstances to her new husband. In exchange for her vow, the husband vows to love and care for her under this vow and all reasonable circumstances for life. This simple, precise formula worked rather flawlessly for about 1950 years, (before demonic feminism began to systematically contradict God’s patriarchal order, in about 1970), of varying modes of Christian conversion, of widely varied cultures, of about 1/3 of the world’s population. Divorces were rare, women caused Catholic and Orthodox Christian divorces were rarer.Virtual believer banishment kept the Church clean of perversion by disloyal betraying divorce causers. After the Catholic Church abandoned biblical patriarchy and adopted the demonic feminist and experimental atheistic psycho/sociological model of marriage, its divorce rate rapidly increased to the same rate as that of the U.S. general population, approximately 50% of divorces end in divorce. The Coptic Church has adopted the same demonic/atheistic marriage model and its feminist women caused divorce rate is accelerating, similarly to the earlier feminist caused Catholic divorce rate increase.

I have talked with several Coptic fathers who were victims of Coptic feminist wife caused divorces who frantically tried to get some meaningful assistance to have contact with their secreted children from the bishop and most of the senior priests in the LA area; or tried to get similar assistance from the bishop and all priests in the Dallas and/or Houston area. These fathers only received disinterest and/or insult, from the bishops and their priests; while their feminist wives received open encouragement, reward and concealment from the older feminist women leaders in their own and neighboring parishes. Are you a Coptic priest? The appearance of your callous disinterest and avoidance of the feminist caused real present suffering of these unnamed current Coptic husbands and children (possibly from your own parish) and your seemingly superficial compassion for my remote case, resembles the aloof disinterest of our current bishops, priests and mercenary psycho/sociologist official Coptic anti-family Freudian therapists. I understand that you may not have been made aware of this crucial heterodox defect in the theology and pastoring of the Shenouda/Coptic Church. Please excuse me for using you to demonstrate this deplorable general phenomenon in our Church. God bless your unknowing participation.

I’d like to read the patriarchal beliefs and teachings of a single patriarchal Coptic bishop or priest, if we have ONE. He should be installed in place of Pope Shenouda as soon as possible so that the demonic, destructive bevy of cancerous feminist, atheistic psycho/sociologists bishops, priests, nuns, theologians, teachers and servants can be rooted out of the Church and cast far from our marriage age youth and young families with sub-adult children. All demonic non-biblical/-patriarchal texts and media in our churches and homes should be burned or shredded beyond use by anyone. I have met a very few paranoid closet patriarchal Coptic priests, but no priest who dares to publically oppose the feminist/Freudian Shenouda Church. I guess Pope Shenouda and his heterodox bishop henchmen are not ashamed to exercise their own strict patriarchal discipline against biblical, openly patriarchal teaching to protect their own heretical feminism and pseudoscientism.

If I have strayed completely off the page, please return me. Sadly we are not accustomed to thinking and writing about these abandoned issues. As we get more practice, and hopefully more leadership and guidance, we’ll become able to think and write clearer and straighter.


_________________
+Our Father, blessed are your Ways and Statutes. Those who love You know and obey them. Deliver Your orthodox families, children and people from the error, misery and confusion caused by unaware, disinterested, proud, fearful, rebellious or innovative patriarchs, bishops, priests, false teachers, influences and spirits who seek to ignore, change, compromise, and destroy the Holy patriarchal gender and family orders and laws that You have established for Your Orthodox Christian Churches and people from the beginning and forever and ever. For their salvation, admonish them with the wisdom, understanding and knowledge of Malachi 2:1-9, 13-17.+

View user's profile Send private message

tonyhabibi

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Sep 17, 2010 - 08:12 AM

I JUST want to say in my defense i wrote this post 3 years ago . I was very immature , and this topic and my post was partially inspired by a conversation i heard on howard stern back then .

3 years later present day ... I am against prenup agreements ... for if u have any doubt that the person you are marrying is going to leave u or will be unfaithful , then dont get married. i feel you should only get married when u trust ur partner 100%.

lastly - i believe , support , and hope to one day soon get married.

View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

AMoussa01

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Sep 17, 2010 - 08:15 AM

Irishpilgrim,

I am going to kindly ask you to refrain from insulting our clergy members. The church does not accept feminism--that means the pope doesn't either! The church also does not believe in Pre-numps.

GB
Tony


_________________
Tony Moza,
HCOC Distant Member

Image
+ To Protect and Preserve +

HCOC: Sing it! Live it! Love it!

View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

Ranya+++

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Sep 18, 2010 - 06:47 AM

Irishpilgrim:

I can’t remember which passage I read about men and women’s souls being the same in nature. I think St. John Chrysostom mentioned it in one of his homilies. You may want to consider reading “St John Chrysostom: On Marriage and Family Life” Translated by Catherine P. Roth & David Anderson.

Below is a quote from St. John Chrysostom’s “On Marriage and Family Life.” (Pages 90-91, How To Choose A Wife).

I advise, therefore, and exhort those who are about to marry that they should approach the blessed Paul and read the laws which he has recorded concerning marriage. First learn what he bids you to do if your wife happens to be wicked, deceitful, alcoholic, abusive, foolish, or subject to any other such fault. Then discuss marriage with this in mind. If you see that he allows you to divorce her and take another if you find any of these faults in her, then enjoy your freedom from care. If, however, he does not allow this, but bids you to be content and keep her with you in spite of any fault except unchastity, then make your resolve firm to endure all your wife’s wickedness. If this is heavy and burdensome, then take every care to choose a good, kind, docile wife. You know that you must make one of two choices. If you take a bad wife, you must endure the annoyance. If you are not willing to do this, you incur the guilt of adultery by divorcing her. The Lord says, ‘Every one who divorces his wife, except on the ground of unchastity, makes her an adulteress; and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.’ (Mt 5:32). If we have investigated these laws and know them well before we marry, we will take great care to choose a wife who is well-ordered from the beginning and compatible with our character. If we marry a woman like this, we will gain not only the benefit that we will never divorce her, but also that we will love her intensely, as Paul commands. For when he says, ‘Husbands, love your wives,’ he does not stop with this, but gives us a measure for love, ‘as Christ loved the Church.’ (Eph 5:25). And how did Christ love the Church? Tell me. ‘He gave Himself up for her.’ So even if you must die for your wife, do not refuse. If the Master loved His servant so much that He gave Himself up for her, all the more you must love your fellow servant as much.

May God grant you peace.

Take care and God Bless.

+ + +

View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

Truth.Seeker

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Sep 18, 2010 - 04:41 PM

Folks, not every one who has something to say should be taken seriously. Example: irishpilgrim. His posts are so erratic and his statements are so ridiculous, that they are to be ignored or briefly ridiculed. That's about as much attention as they should be paid. Otherwise, you're wasting your time.

View user's profile Send private message

Truth.Seeker

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Sep 18, 2010 - 04:50 PM

From irishpilgrim:
I understand that you may not have been made aware of this crucial heterodox defect in the theology and pastoring of the Shenouda/Coptic Church. Please excuse me for using you to demonstrate this deplorable general phenomenon in our Church. God bless your unknowing participation.


Oh, so somewhere in your ranting you showed that the Coptic Church is heterodox on this subject? Really? Do me a favor and point me to this.

View user's profile Send private message

Ranya+++

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Sep 18, 2010 - 06:27 PM

Truth.Seeker and Others:

I know some of you are frustrated with Irishpilgrim’s posts, but I honestly believe Irishpilgrim was wounded. When we are upset or angry, we say things we don’t mean. Even if we know his statements are false, we can still show love towards him. We are called to love everyone.

This really should be pointed to everyone on these forums, including myself. We have to learn to show love to each other even if we disagree with one another. Many people read these forums. They look at the example we set. We are Orthodox Christians, which means we have to learn to love one another.

I also believe some people are afraid or are just tired of posting on these forums because someone may end up attacking him or her on a post. This means that if someone had something beneficial to say to everyone, all of us would miss out on benefitting from this person’s posts because we were harsh with our words.

We also shouldn’t make people feel like they are outsiders. We are all sinners, which means we are all on the same boat.

Some people are more sensitive than others. Hopefully, we can try to keep that in mind when we post. We are all brothers and sisters in Christ.

Imagine if we as Coptic Orthodox Christians worked together in love rather than against each other, we would attract so many people with Christ’s light that shines through us. We belong to Him.

Sorry for drifting off topic again. Take care and God Bless.

+ + +

View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

Truth.Seeker

Back to top Reply with quote

posted on Sep 19, 2010 - 02:50 PM

I'm not frustrated at his posts, I just find them humorous. Wounded or not, nonsense is to be ridiculed. If it will make someone think twice before posting something, good, at least posts will be more intelligently filtered that way.

We are all sinners, which means we are all in the same boat - IF we are talking about who is a sinner. We're not talking about who is a sinner, we're talking about who is saying nonsense - irishpilgrim has taken the motorboat on that one.

Anyway, I have an outstanding question to him, and perhaps if he stops ranting and writes shorter posts in response to direct questions he might get something out of this. I am not optimistic.

View user's profile Send private message
 
 
 

Return to the Forum Index

Powered by the coptichymns.net Network of Coptic Hymns and Coptic Orthodox Sites.

TotalDaily
Topics:77842.22
Users:61961.76
Posts:6469718.42
 

217 unlogged users and No registered users online now.

 

Already a member? Log in above.

Not a member? Register your unique identity to participate more fully in our site!