mzaki
posted on Apr 17, 2007 - 12:27 AM
From mzaki:P=,=c aftwnf
I have shared this view here before:
The church ought to serve the members of the body freely, without prejudice or preference, and without expecting compensation. The members ought to support the church freely, out of commitment and, more importantly, love.
In my humble opinion, this Apostolic model of how the church should "do business" with her congregants is not overly-idealistic, and is still universally applicable. This supersedes any concept of "copyright" that may have been later introduced.
qen oume;myi aftwnf
P=,=c aftwnf
Yes, I am replying to my own post. Just some further explanation as to precisely what I meant.
Service:
Individuals offer service to the church freely, each according to his/her talent and ability --> Church disseminates the service freely, not in proportion to the degree in which individuals can afford the service --> Those who benefit from the services the church offers give to the church freely, not in proportion to the degree in which they were served --> The church supports the services (this includes covering costs and paying salaries) so that the individuals may continue offering service to the church. The cycle continues.
Business:
Individuals with marketable talent/ability/product offer it at a fee --> This item is offered for sale --> Those who want the service or product give money directly to the provider of this service/product.
As I see it, there are inherent differences between these two:
1. When offering service, the church plays a central role. The service is offered to the church. The church decides the manner in which the service is distributed. The church supports those who offer the service.
In the business model, the church has no part in the process, even if the product is "church-related."
2. Service is not sold, but distributed freely. As I am familiar with it the church assigns value to items only as "suggested donations." This is not an arbitrary difference from an absolute price-tag: the service is offered to all regardless of their ability to give back to the church. Additionally, those who are fortunate are free to donate more, those who less fortunate, less. The common denominator though, is that giving to the church is according to ability, and not according to what the church has given (ie, you are not paying for a service, you are donating to the church).
In business, monetary value is assigned to each product/service, and payment is required to obtain that product/service.
3. The servant is supported by the church.
The businessman strives to be self-sufficient, and even profit, and accepts money directly.
Business is business and service is service. I'm afraid the line separating the two is becoming increasingly less distinct (as I see it), and I'm even more afraid that Coptic hymns are slowly turning into a business.
Business, even business involving church-related product, is not wrong, but it is not service.
If we are offering services to the church, let us offer them freely. If we are benefiting from services (and even if we are not), let us support our churches freely and out of the abundance that we have been given.
I'm sorry to steer the discussion even further off its original path.
qen oume;myi aftwnf
_________________
mina.
Joined: Apr 09, 2003 | Posts: 210
Location: Troy, MI