ophadeece
posted on Dec 27, 2007 - 08:50 AM
Dear David_the_King,
Pavly and mikokiko make a very good point here, and I have to say I agree with them 100%. I still agree with what you said but only to an extent. As mikokiko clearly said the words and the tune of the hymns themselves should, at least, be the main source of uplifting even to other people who are not deacons. I understand your point that using cymbals as "percussion instruments" help people follow along, and be on the same page, and also when a mic is not used, or people far at the back will need to listen to the rhythm through the cymbals and triangle being played. However, the answer to that is if all the deacons (and I say all) plus most (if not all) of the congregation know the hymns by heart (in an ideal world of course) there will be no need for the cymbals or the triangle. Not that I am against the usage of them; on the contrary, I find them so pleasant, but only to set the rhythm, not to uplift the hymn. In addition to that, I think the presence of one cantor, or a lead deacon is important, as in my opinion what can really uplift hymns is the speed by which they are sung. For example, if you say "taishori" slow with cymbals and triangle, it will be as sweet as saying "taishori" a bit quicker without either. Trust me, if you try it, it is lovely, and more spiritual. I think this depends really on the level the deacons and the cantors are. If they sing the hymns with a rather quick rhythm concentrating on the words, and the melismata which convey the meaning of these words, there is nothing better...
That is why in my opinion the tune and the ambience of the Passion Week is sad; because of this slowness of hymns being sung. You know what? Even the hymn "Iodas" share its music to a great degree with the joyful Watos Psaly; what is the difference? The beat; the rhythm; the speed by which the tune is sung...
I hope this has made some sense...
God bless you all and pray for us a lot
Joined: Oct 01, 2007 | Posts: 94
Location: Wolverhampton, UK